Navy Height and Weight Standards
The Navy moved to a two-step body composition assessment on 1 January 2026. The weight-for-height table is no longer how Sailors are evaluated — here is what replaced it, and the former chart in full.
Last reviewed: · Sources: NAVADMIN 264/25, DoD fitness standards memorandum, Navy PRP
The short answer
The Navy height and weight standards changed on 1 January 2026. The weight-for-height table is no longer how Sailors are assessed. The Navy now runs a two-step body composition assessment built on a waist-to-height ratio.
NAVADMIN 264/25 states that “BCA procedures have been revised and now consist of a two-step process”. The Department of Defense memorandum driving the change sets the ceiling for every service at a ratio of less than 0.55 and says plainly that “height and weight tables will no longer be utilized to evaluate body composition”.
The former three-step process — weight table, then abdominal circumference, then body fat percentage — is set out further down, because records and most advice online still use it.
The Navy Standard Now
One ratio, assessed twice a year, with a body fat calculation only for Sailors who exceed it.
| Element | Detail |
|---|---|
| Method | Two-step body composition assessment (BCA) |
| Step one | Waist-to-height ratio |
| Threshold | Below 0.55 — the DoD ceiling for all services |
| Step two | Body fat calculation, for members at or above the ratio |
| Frequency | Twice per year |
| Weight table | No longer used to evaluate body composition |
| Change announced | NAVADMIN 264/25, 30 December 2025 |
| In force from | 1 January 2026 |
Where these figures come from
The two-step structure and the December 2025 date are from NAVADMIN 264/25. The 0.55 ceiling, the twice-yearly cadence and the removal of weight tables are from the Department of Defense memorandum. The Navy's own detailed guidance, PRP Guide-4, is published through MyNavy HR but is not openly downloadable, so confirm specifics with your Command Fitness Leader before acting on them.
Waist Chart by Height
Working to the 0.55 ceiling, this is the largest waist that clears it at each height. Every figure is the largest measurement that actually passes, not height multiplied by 0.55 and rounded — at 70 inches that is 38.4 inches, because 38.5 lands on exactly 0.550.
| Height | Inches | Max passing waist | In cm |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4′10″ | 58 | 31.9 in | 81.0 cm |
| 4′11″ | 59 | 32.4 in | 82.3 cm |
| 5′0″ | 60 | 32.9 in | 83.6 cm |
| 5′1″ | 61 | 33.5 in | 85.1 cm |
| 5′2″ | 62 | 34.0 in | 86.4 cm |
| 5′3″ | 63 | 34.6 in | 87.9 cm |
| 5′4″ | 64 | 35.1 in | 89.2 cm |
| 5′5″ | 65 | 35.7 in | 90.7 cm |
| 5′6″ | 66 | 36.3 in | 92.2 cm |
| 5′7″ | 67 | 36.8 in | 93.5 cm |
| 5′8″ | 68 | 37.4 in | 95.0 cm |
| 5′9″ | 69 | 37.9 in | 96.3 cm |
| 5′10″ | 70 | 38.4 in | 97.5 cm |
| 5′11″ | 71 | 39.0 in | 99.1 cm |
| 6′0″ | 72 | 39.5 in | 100.3 cm |
| 6′1″ | 73 | 40.1 in | 101.9 cm |
| 6′2″ | 74 | 40.6 in | 103.1 cm |
| 6′3″ | 75 | 41.2 in | 104.6 cm |
| 6′4″ | 76 | 41.8 in | 106.2 cm |
| 6′5″ | 77 | 42.3 in | 107.4 cm |
| 6′6″ | 78 | 42.9 in | 109.0 cm |
| 6′7″ | 79 | 43.4 in | 110.2 cm |
| 6′8″ | 80 | 43.9 in | 111.5 cm |
A printable one-page version of this chart is on how to calculate the standard. The arithmetic is identical whichever service you are in; only the consequences differ.
↑ Back to the topThe DoD Memo Behind the Change
This was not a Navy initiative. It came from the Department of Defense and applies to every Military Department.
| Direction | Detail |
|---|---|
| Metric | Waist circumference divided by height |
| Ceiling on service policy | Less than 0.55 |
| Goal | A ratio below 0.55 for all Service members |
| If at or above | A body fat calculation as further evaluation |
| Weight tables | “Will no longer be utilized to evaluate body composition” |
| Frequency | Twice per year, by each Military Department |
| Body fat ceiling | Standards “will not be more stringent than 18 percent for men and 26 percent for women” |
| Implementation | From 1 January 2026 |
Two things follow from that. First, each department sets its own policy within the ceiling, so services can differ in detail while sharing the 0.55 figure. Second, body fat percentage was not abolished across DoD — it was moved to a second step. That is where the Navy and the Army diverge, and it is covered below.
↑ Back to the topHow the Two-Step BCA Works
- Step one — the ratioWaist circumference divided by height. A result below the threshold clears the BCA and nothing further is required.
- Step two — body fatA Sailor at or above the threshold moves to a body fat calculation rather than failing outright. This is the step that distinguishes the Navy's approach from the Army's.
Why two steps matters to you
A single ratio measurement is not the end of the assessment in the Navy. Exceeding it routes you to a second evaluation, in the same way exceeding the old weight table routed Sailors to the tape. That is a meaningful difference from the Army, where the ratio is the sole authorised method and a body fat result carries no standing at all.
NAVADMIN 264/25 also notes that the criteria for the High-Performance BCA Exemption Policy have been updated. If you have previously relied on that exemption, the criteria are not the ones you memorised.
↑ Back to the topWhere the Waist Is Measured
This is the detail most comparison pages get wrong, because the services do not all measure at the same place.
| Source | Site | Rounding |
|---|---|---|
| DoD memorandum | Midpoint between the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, parallel to the floor | Inches, rounded down to the nearest ½ inch |
| Army | At the navel, after a normal exhale | Ratio truncated to three decimals |
| Navy, legacy AC | Across the superior border of the iliac crest, in line with the mid-axillary line | Two sets; a third if they differ by more than an inch, then average the two closest |
Those are genuinely different anatomical sites and they will not give the same number on the same person. If you are self-checking, use the site your own service specifies rather than the one you read on a general fitness page. Measuring technique in general, and the errors that cost half an inch, are covered on how to measure your waist correctly.
One Navy habit worth carrying over: taking two measurements and averaging the two closest, rather than taking the lowest, is a more honest self-check than a single hopeful reading.
↑ Back to the topThe Former Three-Step BCA
Until the change, the Navy ran three gates. Most Navy height and weight chart material online still describes this as current. It is useful for reading an older record and for understanding what was replaced.
| Step | Check | If you passed |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Weight-for-height screening | BCA complete |
| 2 | Single-site abdominal circumference (AC) | BCA complete |
| 3 | Body circumference measurement for body fat percentage | Pass against the graduated standard |
The former abdominal circumference maximums
| Sex | Maximum | Result |
|---|---|---|
| Male | 39.0 in | Fail if greater than 39 |
| Female | 35.5 in | Fail if greater than 35.5 |
The former weight-for-height table
| Height | Inches | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|---|
| 4′9″ | 57 | 127 | 127 |
| 4′10″ | 58 | 131 | 131 |
| 4′11″ | 59 | 136 | 136 |
| 5′0″ | 60 | 141 | 141 |
| 5′1″ | 61 | 145 | 145 |
| 5′2″ | 62 | 150 | 149 |
| 5′3″ | 63 | 155 | 152 |
| 5′4″ | 64 | 160 | 156 |
| 5′5″ | 65 | 165 | 160 |
| 5′6″ | 66 | 170 | 163 |
| 5′7″ | 67 | 175 | 167 |
| 5′8″ | 68 | 181 | 170 |
| 5′9″ | 69 | 186 | 174 |
| 5′10″ | 70 | 191 | 177 |
| 5′11″ | 71 | 196 | 181 |
| 6′0″ | 72 | 201 | 185 |
| 6′1″ | 73 | 206 | 189 |
| 6′2″ | 74 | 211 | 194 |
| 6′3″ | 75 | 216 | 200 |
| 6′4″ | 76 | 221 | 205 |
| 6′5″ | 77 | 226 | 211 |
| 6′6″ | 78 | 231 | 216 |
| 6′7″ | 79 | 236 | 222 |
| 6′8″ | 80 | 241 | 227 |
Note how the male and female columns cross over at the lower heights and diverge sharply higher up — a 6-foot male was screened at 201 pounds against a female Sailor's 185. That sex-based gap is one of the things a single ratio removes.
↑ Back to the topNavy Body Fat Limits
The Navy's graduated body fat standards are banded by age and sex. Under the old process they were the final gate; under the two-step process body fat is the second evaluation for anyone over the ratio.
| Age | Male | Female |
|---|---|---|
| 18–21 | 22% | 33% |
| 22–29 | 23% | 34% |
| 30–39 | 24% | 35% |
| 40 and older | 26% | 36% |
Alongside those, the DoD pass limits are 26 percent for men and 36 percent for women. Sailors who exceed the Navy graduated standards are enrolled in the Fitness Enhancement Program — the Navy's equivalent of the Army's body composition programme.
Navy body fat limits are more generous than the Army's were
Compare a 25-year-old: 23 percent in the Navy against 22 percent under the Army's former Table B-2, and 34 against 32 for women. The services never shared a body fat standard, which is why a figure quoted from one branch has never been safe to apply to another.
Where the BCA Sits in the PFA
The body composition assessment is one half of the Navy's Physical Fitness Assessment. The other half is the Physical Readiness Test — the strength, aerobic and endurance events. They are separate results recorded together.
| Body Composition Assessment | Physical Readiness Test | |
|---|---|---|
| What it measures | Body composition | Strength, aerobic and endurance performance |
| Result | Pass or fail | Scored by event |
| Cadence | Twice per year | Twice per year |
| Does one offset the other? | No — both have to be met | |
This is the same separation the Army draws between its fitness test and body composition, and it trips people up for the same reason: the two are run together and recorded together, so they feel like one assessment. The Army version of that confusion is covered on AFT score and body fat.
↑ Back to the topNavy vs Army
Both services now screen on the same ratio. What happens next is where they part company.
| Navy | Army | |
|---|---|---|
| Screening metric | Waist-to-height ratio | Waist-to-height ratio |
| Threshold | Below 0.55 | Below 0.550 |
| If over | Body fat calculation as a second step | Confirmation measurement the same duty day |
| Body fat percentage | Retained as step two | Not used — the ratio is the sole method |
| Can you challenge with a scan? | Body fat evaluation is built in | No — DXA, InBody and Bod Pod have no standing |
| Programme if you fail | Fitness Enhancement Program | Army Body Composition Program |
| Waist site | Per Navy guidance | At the navel |
The Marine Corps went further than either service, setting its screen at 0.52 — see Marine Corps height and weight standards. Every branch side by side is on armed forces weight requirements.
↑ Back to the topJoining the Navy
Accession standards are set separately from in-service ones, and the Navy publishes its joining requirements on its own recruiting site.
Because the DoD direction removes weight tables from body composition evaluation across the department, any Navy weight requirements chart you find for applicants should be checked against the recruiter rather than taken from a third-party page — including this one. The Navy's own requirements page is the place to confirm it.
Be careful with figures from any branch comparison
Three things moved at once in 2026: the metric, the measurement site, and which step body fat sits at. A chart that predates January 2026 will be wrong on at least one of them, and most pages ranking for these terms have not been updated.
Free fitness and nutrition coaching is available to service members and families through Military OneSource.
↑ Back to the topFrequently Asked Questions
What are the Navy height and weight standards in 2026?
The Navy no longer assesses body composition against a weight-for-height table. NAVADMIN 264/25 states that BCA procedures were revised into a two-step process, and the Department of Defense memorandum driving the change sets a ceiling of a waist-to-height ratio below 0.55 for every service, with implementation from 1 January 2026.
Does the Navy still use a height and weight chart?
Not to evaluate body composition. The DoD memorandum states that height and weight tables will no longer be utilised for that purpose. The former Navy weight-for-height table is still useful for reading records created before the change.
What is the Navy waist-to-height ratio standard?
Below 0.55. That figure is the Department of Defense ceiling that applies across all Military Departments, with each department setting its own policy within it. At 70 inches tall, the largest waist that clears it is 38.4 inches.
What is the two-step Navy BCA?
Step one is the waist-to-height ratio. A member at or above the threshold moves to a body fat calculation as a further evaluation rather than failing outright. NAVADMIN 264/25 confirms the two-step structure; the Navy's detailed PRP Guide-4 holds the specifics.
What are the Navy body fat percentage limits?
The Navy's graduated standards are 22 percent for men and 33 for women aged 18 to 21, 23 and 34 at 22 to 29, 24 and 35 at 30 to 39, and 26 and 36 at 40 and over. The DoD pass limits are 26 percent for men and 36 percent for women.
What was the Navy abdominal circumference maximum?
Under the former three-step assessment, 39.0 inches for men and 35.5 inches for women, measured at a single site across the superior border of the iliac crest in line with the mid-axillary line. Exceeding it moved a Sailor to the body fat measurement.
Is the Navy waist measured in the same place as the Army's?
No. The Army measures at the navel. The DoD memorandum specifies the midpoint between the last palpable rib and the top of the iliac crest, and the Navy's legacy abdominal circumference was taken across the superior border of the iliac crest. These are different sites and will not produce the same number.
What happens if a Sailor fails the BCA?
Sailors who exceed the Navy's graduated body fat standards are enrolled in the Fitness Enhancement Program. NAVADMIN 264/25 also updated the criteria for the High-Performance BCA Exemption Policy, so previously memorised exemption criteria may no longer apply.
Is the BCA the same as the PRT?
No. The Physical Fitness Assessment has two halves: the body composition assessment and the Physical Readiness Test of strength, aerobic and endurance events. They are separate results and one does not offset the other.
Do the Navy and Army use the same body composition standard now?
They share the same screening ratio but not the same process. The Navy retains a body fat calculation as a second step for members over the ratio. The Army treats the ratio as the sole authorised method and gives no standing to body fat results, including DXA, InBody and Bod Pod scans.
Sources & References
Official and primary sources
- NAVADMIN 264/25, changes to the Physical Readiness Program — the Navy's own message confirming the two-step BCA, 30 December 2025
- Additional Guidance on Military Fitness Standards — the DoD memorandum setting the 0.55 ceiling across all Military Departments
- Navy Physical Readiness Program — Navy Fitness programme pages and Command Fitness Leader resources
- Navy Body Composition Assessment training guidance — the former three-step BCA, abdominal circumference maximums and body fat standards
- Requirements to join the Navy — Navy recruiting requirements for applicants
- Waist-to-height ratio now central to military body-composition standards — reporting on how each service implemented the DoD direction
- Army modifies body composition program, adopts waist-to-height ratio — Army Public Affairs, 7 July 2026
- Army Directive 2026-13, Army Body Composition Program and Standards — Army Publishing Directorate
- DoD Instruction 6130.03, Volume 1 — Military Medical Standards — accession medical standards, via the Health Affairs accessions page
- Military OneSource — free fitness and nutrition coaching for service members
Standards change. Confirm anything career-affecting with your chain of command, your recruiter, or the current publication on Army Publishing Directorate before acting on it.
The arithmetic is the same either way
The ratio is calculated identically in every service. The calculator on the front page runs it and shows your margin; only the consequences of being over differ by branch.
Military H&W Calculator